Robbie Savage: Chelsea were boring!!!!
I was looking around the net and this article by Robbie Savage caught my attention. The article written by Savage (and you have to ask wh...
https://www.chelseadaft.org/2010/09/robbie-savage-chelsea-were-boring.html
I was looking around the net and this article by Robbie Savage caught my attention. The article written by Savage (and you have to ask what the hell does he know about football in the first place and what he has achieved to warrant a coloumn in the National Press) states that Chelsea were boring on Wednesday in the Champions League along with the Arsenal.
He says:
Arsenal and Chelsea hit 10 between them on Wednesday night yet both games were utterly boring. The fact is that the Champions League group stage is a dull farce in which teams with money inevitably steamroller the ones without. The sooner Uefa go back to the old European Cup-style knockout system the better.So what do you think about his article?. Let's be honest the bloke is a joke. For someone who has never played Champions League football to comment is in my view to be taken with a pinch of salt in the first place. MSK Zilina are champions of the Slovakian league so why shouldn't they be allowed to make some money out of the competition?. Braga had knocked out Seville in the qualifiers so they earn't their place in the competition.
To say Chelsea were boring is ridiculous. Its just we are playing well and at the moment teams are finding it difficult to live with us.
So what do the rest of you think. Were Chelsea boring? and is the Champions League boring?
KTBFFH